No. 18-6342
Jaime Rene Lopez-Vaal v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: accomplice-liability aggravated-felony criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection federal-sentencing immigration immigration-law ninth-circuit-review sentencing statutory-interpretation void-for-vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2018-11-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Section 1326(b) is unconstitutionally vague
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JAIME RENE LOPEZ-VAAL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Kent D. Young The Law Offices Of Kent D. Young 501 W. Broadway, Suite A526 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 793-4924 Attorney For Petitioner
Docket Entries
2018-11-19
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2018)
Attorneys
Jaime Lopez-Vaal
Kent Darroch Young — The Law Offices Of Kent D. Young, Petitioner
Kent Darroch Young — The Law Offices Of Kent D. Young, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent