No. 18-6353
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process legal-precedent prosecutor-misconduct prosecutorial-misconduct supreme-court supreme-court-jurisprudence supreme-court-precedent texas-court-of-criminal-appeals
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment
FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2018-12-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a prosecutor who violates the Double Jeopardy Clause should have exclusive power to determine which of his unconstitutionally obtained convictions should be vacated by the courts
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a prosecutor who violates the Double Jeopardy Clause should have exclusive power to determine which of his unconstitutionally obtained convictions should be vacated by the courts. il
Docket Entries
2018-12-10
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-14
Waiver of right of respondent Texas to respond filed.
2018-10-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2018)
Attorneys
Texas
Elisha Naomi Bird — 35th Judicial District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Elisha Naomi Bird — 35th Judicial District Attorney's Office, Respondent