No. 18-6358
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: and Are Plain and Affect Petitioner's Substantial -and-Are-Plain-and-Affect-Petitioner's-Substantial 18-usc-3661 5th-amendment appeal-waiver appeal-waiver,sentencing-guidelines,criminal-histo criminal-history criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-discretion mandatory-minimum plain-error sentencing-guidelines substantial-rights trial-court-error Whether the mandatory five-year minimum sentence u
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-11-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner's Appeal Waiver Is Inapplicable to Issues of Trial Court Error in Applying Sentencing Guidelines' Enhancements or in Calculating Criminal History Points When Such Errors Are Subsequent to the Execution of the Waiver, and Are Plain and Affect Petitioner's Substantial Rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether Petitioner’s Appeal Waiver Is Inapplicable to Issues of Trial Court Error in Applying Sentencing Guidelines’ Enhancements or in Calculating Criminal History Points When Such Errors Are Subsequent to the Execution of the Waiver, and Are Plain and Affect Petitioner’s Substantial Rights. 1
Docket Entries
2018-11-19
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2018)
Attorneys
Alj Hilton
Robert Allen Ratliff — Robert A Ratliff, PC, Petitioner
Robert Allen Ratliff — Robert A Ratliff, PC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent