Edwin Darrell Lett v. Mississippi
Securities Immigration
Whether the petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial was violated when the Mississippi Supreme Court failed to properly review the trial court's denial of the petitioner's request for a continuance to obtain counsel
No question identified. : Does ton&) Peese nted TTY sseé ONES — Glerree Tee Meh ge PANELS DEAS 1OWS ae) WR muss issiepi = Qupeame vee ARE MAL “Wdamanis ONda QZ u.s. C.. BSErthov jAaS1 ~E SsSue WT Twoe a) Were A CONS tee hue _ AmMadmMan OF WE Pe ANONERS rs dic twat Nio La tet hs Six tt Amadmat Right “re Notce ANe TRE «60 FAP AM ev dm eat Ria WE TS Doe PZOCESS “Esse = THe CED Cone HER Te WYViSS ‘ssi ppt Sirean € CekHAS Steict iy AN ct Remo LAG Ly Aer ligt A Sinte Proce sueAL BA —TD A cAm Aboot A CONS ede The AMNAdM EXE WO A Ws dictmart TLL sue fave Cruy Wheter Te fe kK tyoveR WAS Digest ms Sy +e AmMaidmat LiGQht —p A Fam ~TRIAL Othe “WHE ei AL Co3wr Fa\Llét “to FLO PBL in | |