Did the lower court err in granting summary judgment in favor of Respondents on Petitioner's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim, by issuing a decision that conflicts with this Court's precedent regarding the denial of medical treatment?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . I. Did the lower court ern tn gloating surmary Jsidguent in Favor of Respondents on Petitroners Ejghth Anendment deliberate indifPerence claim, by tssuing a declsion that conflict with this Courts precedent regarding the denial of nedical treatment ? EZ. bid the lower court err in granting sursmary Judgereat in favor of Respondents oa Petitioner's cloi under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Arendtent, by entering a decision thot contlict with this Court§ precedent regarding the right to refuse unwanted medica! treatment ? I. Did the lower court err in graating survrary judgrteat in Paver : of Respondents, by entering a decision that conflict with Hus Court$ precedent regarding how only a trier of fact can resolve genuine disputes of material fachs ? I. Did the lower court violte the law-of-the-case doctrine when it denied Davis’ sunmary fudgrent motion on the rerits, then groated Davis’ sumnoty yudgrent motion, on the second pound without additrena/ evidence ? .