Does it violate equal protection and access, is it a property deprivation (i.e., the civil action for damages) and FRBP and 28 USC 158 violation when a Bankruptcy Court Clerk effectively closes the Clerk's Office and the court it serves to timely receipt of USPS mail filings

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does it violate equal protection and access, is it a property deprivation (.e., the civil action for damages) and FRBP and 28 USC 158 violation when a Bankruptcy Court Clerk effectively closes the Clerk’s Office and the court it serves to timely receipt of USPS mail filings.. 2. Is it a further property deprivation (i.e., of the Caesar’s bankruptcy settlement distribution) when a Bankruptcy Court Clerk precludes appeal of an expunged bankruptcy claim by effectively closing the Clerk’s Office and the court it serves to timely receipt of USPS mail filings. 3. Is it a breach of accepted judicial practice to deny jurisdiction and yet to decide; the central issue on appeal, i.e., the basis on which jurisdiction was denied. 4. Is it a further breach of accepted judicial practice for pro se status and/or to allow . the demonization of a pro se litigant so as to blind the courts to a factual predicate that amounts to a legal absurdity and memorializes constitutional deprivations 2 .