No. 18-6377
Rashad Woodside v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights counsel-presence criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process limited-remand open-court resentencing right-to-be-present right-to-counsel sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant has the right to be present with counsel at a resentencing hearing
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a defendant has the right to be present with counsel at a resentencing hearing where the reasons for the sentence are stated in open court after a limited remand when the issues on remand were not previously addressed and the issues on remand are in dispute? ii
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-08
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-12-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 9, 2019 to February 8, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-12-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 8, 2019.
2018-12-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 9, 2019.
2018-12-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2018 to January 9, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-09
Response Requested. (Due December 10, 2018)
2018-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2018)
Attorneys
RASHAD WOODSIDE
Dustin M Blake — BLAKE LAW FIRM CO., LLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent