Is a judgment void on its face when a State Court steals a paid-for home at the motion to dismiss stage of the proceedings, under the guise that the owner was a tenant, where plaintiff attorneys misrepresented the law and contractual terms 30 times in a 6 page document, then wrote the 'Statement of Facts and Conclusions of Law' with no reference to the purported record, and the judge rubber-stamped plaintiff's claims, and the court denied itself jurisdiction by not strictly adhering to the statute, thereby implicating conspiracy

QUESTION PRESENTED Is a judgment void on its face, when a State Court steals a paid-for home at the motion to dismiss stage of the proceedings, under the guise that the owner was a tenant, where plaintiff attorneys misrepresented the law and contractual terms of the : purchase contract 30 times in a 6 page document, then wrote the “Statement of Facts and Conclusions of ; Law,” with no reference to the purported record, and . the judge rubber-stamped plaintiff's claims, and the court denied itself jurisdiction by not strictly adhering . , to the statute, thereby implicating conspiracy. | ii |