I. Whether the Eleventh Circuit Misapplied Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b) and
United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 (1998) by Failing to Grant Relief
for Plain Errors that Affected Petitioner's Substantial Rights.

II. Whether the Eleventh Circuit Misapplied United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.
220, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005) and Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 128 S.Ct. 586
(2007), by Finding Petitioner's Sentence to Be Substantively Reasonable
Notwithstanding That Petitioner's Mental Disabilities and That Unwarranted
Sentencing Disparities Compelled a Lower Sentence.

A. Whether this Court Should Establish That Mental Retardation is
an Organic Disability That Requires Special Heightened
Consideration by the District Court Under 18 U.S.C. §
8558(a)(1).

B. Whether this Court Should Establish That Unwarranted
Sentencing Disparities Require Special Heightened
Consideration by the District Court Under 18 U.S.C. §
3553(a)(6).

whether-the-eleventh-circuit-misapplied-fed-r-crim-p-52(b)-and-united-states-v-olano