Whether the Eleventh Circuit abused its discretion in overlooking the relevant state law procedural principles underlying petitioner's constitutional claim of ineffective assistance of counsel when denying a certificate to appeal the denial of 60(b) relief

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION . IN OVERLOOKING THE RELEVANT STATE LAW PROCEDURAL PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN DENYING A CERTIFICATE TO APPEAL THE DENIAL OF 60(b) RELIEF 2. WHETHER A FEDERAL HABEAS COURT OWES DEFERENTIAL REVIEW TO THE ORIGINAL STATE. TRIAL COURTS ORDER THAT UNDERLIES THE SUBSEQUENT STATE HABEAS COURT’S ORDER ; 3. WHETHER REASONABLE JURISTS WOULD DEBATE THAT EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES DOES NOT APPLY TO SUBDIVISIONS (1) AND (4) OF RULE 60(b) i .