Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims alleging violations of his civil rights and due process rights

No question identified. : | | 2 [ASM #0 FOWUISTIEY SaupaedSIN) Cf NUNS SWOULAL >“ LIN Sz07 4vaig SNOCNYEY CHVNMALSY Mr sozoxd wally ZU W _LSISS¥ YL. aomroud Syl HU WIL Vo FHL U PUNT SPIOTNIGAT MID Sf FIND JASNA) MIM (9) d TIVO 29 SDULSIISY FAUPIASIM AULRLLLSIVG] SIVOLDY Sif LIV S20 “FINISH WO ouuLnas24e any pouyyedaxd ood HOWL. OS DL LST WY IVD ff SRLPLLSANM UL sassy PSD Mf h shewwnggn GM 22x%4 SY AIGISIVTY FE TUS PISSING] ¥ MY) ‘OGM | UITEY HOW 2A le LYN muy ONE BY SOFTHAAD. IWAFIUUNG IT Ht EE | SHOUTED Ysv nym (S) of hoes ONY IDLY 2 WAGWAY FILLY . Ht. 7O SNCUG ll. LH INS 79 N24 MG My por her azoy YL AxF7PAG noryz0g a dg prorsiaxadas OMY LYOIST MK 7? FP Fl HOYIDY, ZIPAOLM TA SY WFAN LYM. yy —_LIFUU2LES § FNILYMIVIOM -I725 VIN CNY SLFTNANM ANINFISOYD WYT UY Me ATAU NYU CL LPPLGN yO L99aIT eaLaHPT <yariwWwHtag 54 Ag ai my Nantz st Bam Fez weep ¥ HY (Z) JG SUM BMIVTO) Se SYTALD midge [WW] UL WH C2WLL IF ave OM, ASYM AD LINDY Yl Ni *LINANIONIM WY ISIE TAINS _isswaim yo nese LY, zonvindbuny NM ONY = QNIWOUSIED YY N_LSPYLN/ 20 poswad ¥ QM Bh. 25 rocks ¥ suai ee 990NO MI usxey My SKYTICZ, Apziyx29NH xTILO LNBWIDYOINT FIV NOM) GALN3S3ud (S)NOILSAND