No. 18-6405

Sydney L. Thieszen v. Nebraska

Lower Court: Nebraska
Docketed: 2018-10-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: eighth-amendment juvenile-sentencing life-without-parole miller-v-alabama montgomery-v-louisiana tatum-v-arizona
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2018-11-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eighth Amendment permits a juvenile convicted of a homicide offense to be sentenced to the functional equivalent of life without parole

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed a sentence of 70 years’ to life imprisonment for a juvenile convicted of first degree murder. The questions presented are: 1. Whether the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct 2455 (2012), Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 US. ___,136 S. Ct. 718 (2016), and Tatum v. Arizona, 580 U.S. ___, 1378, Ct. 11 (2016), permit a juvenile convicted of a homicide offense to be sentenced to the functional equivalent of life without parole. 2. Whether a de facto sentence of life without parole for a juvenile denies the offender a meaningful opportunity to obtain release based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation demanded by the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution in violation of Miller y. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 132 S.Ct. 2455 (2012), Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. __,136 S, Ct. 718, 193 L. Ed. 2d 599 (2016), and Tatum y. Arizona, 580 U.S. __, 137 S. Ct. 11 (2016). i

Docket Entries

2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-02
Waiver of right of respondent State of Nebraska to respond filed.
2018-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 23, 2018)

Attorneys

State of Nebraska
Melissa Renee VincentAssistant Attorney General, Respondent
Sydney Thieszen
Jeffery Andrew Pickens — Petitioner