No. 18-6406
Tags: attorney-client-privilege attorney-client-relationship constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel law-enforcement right-to-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-12-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defense attorney renders ineffective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether a defense attorney renders ineffective assistance of counsel — in violation of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution — by failing to inform a client accused of a crime that an attorney-client “walk-through” of the alleged crime scene is not protected by the attorney-client privilege because the “walk-through” was occurring in the presence of a law enforcement officer who was ordered to escort the client to the scene. il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii
Docket Entries
2018-12-10
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2018-10-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 23, 2018)
Attorneys
Daniel Tappen
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
State of Florida