Whether the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that Petitioner Vue failed to state a claim' is in contrary to the holding of Wilkinson v. Dotson

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that Petitioner Vue “failed to state a claim” is in contrary to the holding of Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74 (2005), where . Petitioner Vue, under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, challenges the constitutionality of the Oklahoma . state parole procedures on constitutional and statutory grounds. : 2. Whether Petitioner Vue’s 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 claim on the crucial distinction between . . judicial review of substantive agency decisions and judicial review of the agency’s . compliance with the substantive requirements of Oklahoma Statutes title 57, § 332.7 (Supp. 2017) is cognizable to the Fourteenth Amendment of the United State’s Constitution’s “due process of law clause” and “equal protection of law clause.”