Michael McKinzy v. Carletha Gaston (McKinzy)
Did Missouri (CSE) violate Father's United States Constitutional Rights to Due Process of Law and Equal Protection of Laws under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution by Failing to provide Father timely notice of its pending judicial proceedings and failing to serve its Final Order on Father at his last Known address?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Fhe Missouri Divison of Child Support Enforeemest (OCSE) was Tequived under sections 464.476 and 4E4H76.5 RSMo( 2008) +o mai a Copy oT its Final Order 40 Fathers laet Known address and serve him ‘nokice of its pending judicial prot ecdings. H ave Niseourt (D696) tailed fy mail a Cop y of its Fine Orler to Father’ act Known address, never provided Father tim ely notice ot its pending vudicial proceedin 9, and never informed Fathe oPhis ¢ ight to fie a AihtonfirTadiead Review of tre final Order in the Jackson County Cireult Court within 5g days w mailing’ Did Mi coouri (CSE) vi late Fathers Wnited States Constitutional — Rights to Oue Frovess of Law and Equal Protection of Laws under the Fourteenth Amendment of the lated States Conatthaton y by Faflin to provide Father timely notice ofits pendin \dicial proceedings and $ai\inge +o serve Hofinal Order on Father i his bast Known addgees? |