No. 18-6411

Ennis Reed v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2018-10-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure discrimination due-process equal-protection jury-selection peremptory-challenges racial-bias racial-discrimination voir-dire
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference: 2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Has California again departed from the federal standards governing determinations of racial bias during jury voir dire?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED HAS CALIFORNIA AGAIN DEPARTED FROM THE FEDERAL STANDARDS GOVERNING DETERMINATIONS OF RACIAL BIAS DURING JURY VOIR DIRE?

Docket Entries

2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-01-22
Brief of respondent State of California in opposition filed.
Certificate of Word CountCertificate of Word CountMain Document
2018-12-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 23, 2019.
2018-12-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 24, 2018 to January 23, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
2018-11-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 24, 2018.
2018-11-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 23, 2018 to December 24, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
Main Document
2018-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 23, 2018)
PetitionMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis

Attorneys

Ennis Reed
Gail Ellen Harper — Gail Harper, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
State of California
William Hyunmin Shin — California Department of Justice, Respondent