No. 18-6414

Marvin K. Locke v. Daniel Paramo, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-10-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: common-law constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process felony-murder habeas-corpus ninth-circuit procedural-default second-successive-petition standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2018-12-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the second-degree felony murder rule is based on statute

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. THE DISTRICT COURT FOUND THE ISSUE " A HABEAS CORPUS IS AN APPROPRIATE VEHICAL FORSECOND OR SUCCESSIVE PETITION. THE DISTRICT COURT FOUND THIS ISSUE TO BE MOOT. THUS, IN THE ANSWER THE STATE WAVIED ANY PROCEDUAL DEFAULT DEFENSE BY FAILING TO PRESENT ONE IN THEIR ANSWER. THE DISTRICT COURT DECLINE TO EXERCISE IT'S DISCRETION TO RAISE PROCEDUAL DEFAULT SUA SPONTE. THEREFORE, PETITIONER WILL NOT PURSUE THE ISSUE IN THIS WRIT BEFORE THE COURT. 2. WHETHER THE SECONDDEGREE FELONY MURDER RULE, ALTHOUGH DERIVED FROM THE COMMON LAW, IS BASED ON STATUE; " IT's SIMPLY ANOTHER INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 188'S ABANDONED AND MALIGNANT HEART LANguage. i

Docket Entries

2018-12-10
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-16
Waiver of right of respondent Daniel Paramo, Warden to respond filed.
2018-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2018)

Attorneys

Daniel Paramo, Warden
David Delgado-Rucci — Respondent
David Delgado-Rucci — Respondent
Marvin Locke
Marvin K. Locke — Petitioner
Marvin K. Locke — Petitioner