Whether the trial court's denial of petitioner's writ of habeas corpus led to a violation of the petitioner's constitutional rights under the Fourteenth Amendment

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the tral Courts denial of Rbvoners Ldrit of Habeas Corfus led Pursuant to Florida fules of Court 3.450) alleging hak RbtHaaer Could Wave Filed ao ely sneflechive assistance ot Counsel Closm ased on Counsel's wisadvice alboul Sentence enhancement for Subseduend Sentencing Violated the Lnrted States Consttarhooal Biante & PbHoner Rarcuarit fo Amendment fourteenth. ushen the ruling conflicts vith Stace decisis hase law from the Flaads Suecraome Court voore ib was Found trek ofGirmative misadvice by Counsel about te Collateral effeebof Libuve Sentence -enbuncind Polential does nok meet BhicKland's reauiscements for o valid Cam of ineffeckive assistance. of Counsel.and , _ Loether denying Pehhoawe rehie® under the Stabe Habeas CorPus, under He Crreumstanees, dorved Prone a Cure for the Procedural Aul Process . Violated ? Amend ment jue :