Whether District Court erred in imposing overbroad conditions of Supervised Release, limiting Petitioner's access to the Internet, for the term of said supervision

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether District Court erred in imposing overbroad conditions of Supervised Release, limiting Petitioner's access to the Internet, for the. term of said supervision; 2. Whether District Court erred in imposing overbroad conditions of Supervised Release, in banning Petitioner from the possession of, viewing, of all adult bornog taphy ; ; 3. Whether the waiver to. Petitioner's right to Appeal should be upheld; 4. Whether counsel was ineffective in his assistance during pre-trial, sentencing, Direct Appeal, and § 2255 motion; 5. Whether the government violated Petitioner's constitutional right(s) when it failed to fulfill its promise, and agreement, at the the PLEA HEARING CHANGE, to return all of the equipment that did not contain any evidence related to the instant case. i . iN va i) j