No. 18-6425

Michael Louis Beattie v. L. Romero, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-10-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-procedure administrative-remedies admissions civil-procedure civil-procedure-summary-judgment civil-procedure-summary-judgment-uncontroverted-fa exhaustion-of-remedies fact-admission moving-party non-moving-party prison-grievance prison-grievances procedural-default summary-judgment uncontroverted-facts
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2018-11-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When, during Summary Judgment proceedings, a non-moving party asserts a fact - or set of facts - and the moving party doesn't dispute the fact, is the fact asserted considered admitted? Put another way, is an uncontroverted fact deemed admitted?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : : 1.) When, during Summary Judgment proceedings, a non-moving party asserts a fact or set of facts and the moving party doesn't dispute the fact, _ 7 is the fact asserted considered admitted? Put another way, is an uncontroverted fecefact deemed admitted? 2.) Is a prison grievance "properly submitted" when, per the prison's own : ; regulations, the prison official on duty at the time takes possession of the grievance for the. purpose of mailing it to the final level of review? 3.) When prison officials lose a properly submitted grievance, and, as a direct of that loss, the time for submitting the grievance expires, is the prisoner deemed to have exhausted all "available" remedies?

Docket Entries

2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent L. Romero to respond filed.
2018-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 23, 2018)

Attorneys

L. Romero
Michelle Devorah IgraCalifornia Department of Justice - Office of the A, Respondent
Michelle Devorah IgraCalifornia Department of Justice - Office of the A, Respondent
Michael Louis Beattie
Michael Louis Beattie — Petitioner
Michael Louis Beattie — Petitioner