No. 18-6429
Victor Dewayne White v. Ector County Appraisal District
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion california-v-larue civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation court-discretion due-process federal-law judicial-ruling jurisdiction legal-procedure standing state-courts subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Texas Courts abuse their discretion when they ruled contrary to established Federal Law, or as now ruled contrary to this Honorable Court's Ruling in California v. LaRue, when the lower court's clearly lacked subject-matter jurisdiction?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED "NO. ONE a . : Did the Texas Courts abuse thier descretion when they ruled. contrarily to established Federal Law, or as now Rule contrary to this Honorable Court's Ruling in california v. LaRue, when the lower~-court's clearly “ jurisdiction?.
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-02
Waiver of right of respondent Ector County Appraisal District to respond filed.
2018-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2018)
2018-07-03
Application (18A18) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until October 1, 2018.
2018-06-05
Application (18A18) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 2, 2018 to October 1, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Ector County Appraisal District
Edward J. Nicholas — Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP, Respondent
Edward J. Nicholas — Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP, Respondent