Whether the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence from illegal searches

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW L WHETHER REVIEW IS WARRANTED BECAUSE THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN REFUSING TO SUPPRESS THE EVIDENCE AND FRUITS OF THE ILLEGAL SEARCHES OF RESIDENCES AT CANDLEWYCK, EDWIN, AND DRAGONFLY WHERE THE AFFIDAVITS IN SUPPORT OF THESE SEARCH WARRANTS LACKED PROBABLE CAUSE AND THE GOOD FAITH EXCEPTION COULD NOT OPERATE TO SAVE THESE OBVIOUSLY DEFICIENT AFFIDAVITS? Answers: Yes . Respondent-Appellee Answers: No Il. WHETHER REVIEW IS WARRANTED BECAUSE THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FINDING THAT MR. JENKINS LACKED STANDING TO CHALLENGE THE SEARCH OF THE SUITCASE AND REFUSING TO SUPPRESS THE EVIDENCE FOUND IN THE SUITCASE? Answers: Yes Respondent-Appellee Answers: No Wi. WHETHER REVIEW IS WARRANTED BECAUSE THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN REFUSING TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE DISCOVERED DURING THE ILLEGAL SEIZURE AND SUBSEQUENT SEARCH OF THE FORD FUSION? Answers: Yes Respondent-Appellee Answers: No i