No. 18-6434
Craig Martin Shults v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-review civil-procedure criminal-procedure due-process federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure ninth-circuit precedent rule-52(b) severance severance-motion waiver waiver-rule
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether failure to renew a severance motion at the close of evidence waives the issue, such that it precludes appellate review
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether failure to renew a severance motion at the close of evidence waives the issue, such that it precludes appellate review. Only the Ninth Circuit applies a wholesale waiver rule, which conflicts with the other courts of appeals, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b), and this Court’s precedent. --prefix-
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2018)
Attorneys
Craig Shults
Devin Jai Burstein — Warren & Burstein, Petitioner
Devin Jai Burstein — Warren & Burstein, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent