No. 18-6436
Jorge Cintron v. Tammy Ferguson, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Phoenix, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-violation certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-misconduct newly-discovered-evidence standing trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2018-11-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Appeals Erred in denying a Certificate of Appeability and in evaluating the claims under Brady violation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ISSUE 1: Did the Court of Appeals Erred in denying a Certificate of , Appeability and in evaluating the claims under Brady violation _ ISSUE 2: Should this Honorable Court Grand Certiorari on Appellant newly undisclosed discovered evidence, that trial judge had on her “ possession at the time of trial and before trial. # ii
Docket Entries
2018-11-19
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-29
Waiver of right of respondents Tammy Ferguson, et al. to respond filed.
2018-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2018)
2018-08-02
Application (18A120) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 17, 2018.
2018-07-17
Application (18A120) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 18, 2018 to November 17, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Tammy Ferguson, et al.
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent