No. 18-6437

Corey Holder v. Michael Sepanek, Warden

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-10-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-court-jurisdiction civil-procedure due-process excusable-neglect extension-of-time ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jurisdiction prima-facie-request record-review remand time-extension
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Had the Circuit Court of U.S. errored in failing to properly review the record and remand to the district court for consideration and necessary findings, on Holder's prima facie request for an extension of time or excusable neglect for the untimely appeal, prior to the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Had the Circuit Court of U.S. errored in failing to properly review the record and remand to the district court for consideration and necessary findings, on Holder's prima facie request for an extension . of time or excusable neglect for the untimely appeal, prior to the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction? II. Had the Circuit Court of U.S. jurisdiction to hear and decide the merits of Holder's ineffective assistance of counsel claims due to excusable neglect? fa ~

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent Michael Sepanek, Warden to respond filed.
2017-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2018)

Attorneys

Corey Holder
Corey Holder — Petitioner
Corey Holder — Petitioner
Michael Sepanek, Warden
Suzanne M. Williams — Respondent
Suzanne M. Williams — Respondent