No. 18-6441

Roderick McKissick v. Nathan Deal, Governor of Georgia, et al.

Lower Court: Georgia
Docketed: 2018-10-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus prejudice retaliation standing
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether prior inconsistencies in testimony should be counted as lies which is a clear unlawful deprivation and deep denial of proper determination

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \) Whedter Ors icr, eerocy in Yee. Crorogs ot previous COSES Sroud act be Counted os Skies Uhith is a Clear Cnloaukul OepsNodds orc Weep Cenial SF pcoper Oebecminotion. 2.) Urelher tyes Cour hoor Pre leo x Yau ority and loukul (ucindidkinn Xo brow” the Pelalioner the Qeliel Stuer we pork & Modan’ ecoper | RAedd iy thee lover courts, ; 3) Preudice Owcriminodory Prockice & Corse, Derion yidledins, &liioner’Y UH) Vindichive Rebolicdord doky R Osteimmotion In Pre, Dicanh deni Proceed Ta Forrm Dupes,

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2018)

Attorneys

Roderick McKissick
Roderick McKissick — Petitioner