No. 18-6455

Ronnie McGee v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of Florida

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2018-10-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2244 district-court-review due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-courts federal-habeas gonzalez-v-crosby habeas-corpus section-2254 statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a district court's misconstrual of a § 2254 claim and/or failure to consider or properly consider material evidence submitted to support a claim constitutes a defect in the integrity of the federal habeas proceeding for failure to reach the merits of the claim under Gonzalez v. Crosby, and whether this is contrary to Congress' intent under § 2244

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . WHEN A DISTRICT COURT MISCONSTRUES A § 2254 CLAIM AND/OR FAILS TO CONSIDER OR PROPERLY CONSIDER MATERIAL EVDIENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT A CLAIM, DOES THIS CONSTITUTE A DEFECT IN THE INTEGRITY OF THE FEDERAL . HABEAS PROCEEDING FOR FAILURE OF THE DISTRICT COURT TO REACH THE MERITS OF THE CLAIM UNDER GONZALEZ V. CROSBY, AND IS THIS CONTRARY TO CONGRESS INTENT UNDER § 2244? ii

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-10
Waiver of right of respondent The Attorney General of the State of Florida to respond filed.
2018-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 26, 2018)

Attorneys

Ronnie McGee
Ronnie Lee McGee — Petitioner
The Attorney General of the State of Florida
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent