Ronnie McGee v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of Florida
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Whether a district court's misconstrual of a § 2254 claim and/or failure to consider or properly consider material evidence submitted to support a claim constitutes a defect in the integrity of the federal habeas proceeding for failure to reach the merits of the claim under Gonzalez v. Crosby, and whether this is contrary to Congress' intent under § 2244
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . WHEN A DISTRICT COURT MISCONSTRUES A § 2254 CLAIM AND/OR FAILS TO CONSIDER OR PROPERLY CONSIDER MATERIAL EVDIENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT A CLAIM, DOES THIS CONSTITUTE A DEFECT IN THE INTEGRITY OF THE FEDERAL . HABEAS PROCEEDING FOR FAILURE OF THE DISTRICT COURT TO REACH THE MERITS OF THE CLAIM UNDER GONZALEZ V. CROSBY, AND IS THIS CONTRARY TO CONGRESS INTENT UNDER § 2244? ii