Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED of. Shad () Deus Vv. Tone (ous) CH, Sith Aux MoT ; SAFE CUM Fe Av Actus» Wir facet wOpicensTion) ; the picHi FO QuH/Jée_ pr AN Ounce. Stes oF THE Chine. faces) aX the ones Shar va S ised on: ‘ : (4) Pickens Vv. Ty hore (2000) (we AAVE peed) Lhe dice] efheclE) where ANSTIE of Gs HAS RE Dewed PRTRELY OR Dowel A CRITKAL STREE OF THe Ure we Os Le) Lait) Sob Vv Crore (ise) (wiewsre Rwensoe 1s repuine) wire Tne rhe KEEN A GMPLETE DAML of GANS AP A CRITIC. ; SMe of We Cem ce) no) § . : (4) Goan Vv. Wim RAT lines) CQertr 76 ATronny \ ; , BE ovERTURNE’ ? 2 pul cal “Un Fucey’ prSoriB2) " ed sexrron), he » Pysier . he the “hur farce “ op ATH Wikerd THe sno ieerios JERE NoT MEST BY Te Yer anel 7 on THe mEDdInTIon) INUeLSES) 1S MoT A GunTReeLey SUBSTON CE ?