When legislatures of a state repeal members, employees, and expenses of a state-created agency, can the agency members, employees, and expenses remain operating on state government revenue while still under the legislature's repeal statutory provision?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Lf legislatures of @ Eltote’..2 Repeal” members , employes, and expenses of 9 fsHete-cregfted’ agency ; cen the agency members, employees, and eX penses , Temaia op erating on ‘ revenve —while $#//f under legislature's “Re peq/ ” stefuter °Y provision (s) ? when legisletures of 9 Hate’... “"Repea| “ members employees, and expenses of 9 “Bitatecregted *99enty s con Financia] revenue continue financing the ‘(sHolecreated agency, members, em mp levees, aadexpenses —— while st/Il under legis loture’s "Repeal ” statutory provision )? By uthen legislature's of ¢ ‘Eltote’ »+ “Repeal members, employees, and expenses oF | (SHete -creqted "agency joan “(plrivote leJotreprenvers ; provide Financial ” to the [sHete agency’, members, émplofees, and expenses —— while Bltete cregted agency remains under fegis/q tures _.. . “Repel” Statutory provision(sy? oo Cd ferced Lobor when legisletuce’s of @ ‘[sItete’..., “"Reped|" pémbers employee sand expenses of 9 Giteteceested” 99 encgjcan the "Repea| “ stete-agency ; members, LMPIRESES, Gnd expenses ‘gontinueenforcing “public secu'tude contracts) statutory provisioncs) 2 Ts] when legislature's of ¢ ‘Eitete’ oo Repeal” members, employees, 9nd expenses of @ Gltete-created agency: can the “Repeal ; st4te-dgency, members i employees ,gnd expenses ,esteblish “sew” and/or reformed pubic servitude contract (s) with former recipients — while strte-eregted ogency remains under legis igfure’s “Repeq |” Stetutory provision(s)? ? : (continue) [be Tove process When legislatures of 4 ‘sltete’ establish judicial Ts/tabutor “construe tio ‘ PP 19ble for crtizens sudic jel review(s) > can the ea ere . [sit¢te [eJourts relinguish its Judieqlduty to the estob/ished it " : » . Eltetutery’ tutery construction — Without explicit endfor, ienphicrt Statutory autho rif y 4 When legislatures of 9 ‘(s]t¢te’ estobtisl, Sudicia| ‘listutor: "construction for Courtcs) service of process and summons) scan per se‘tsHotu tory 7 construction be extended by Sudicialmembers — without explicit eadjer implicit [STtatutory” quthority 2. ts] | whea legeslqtures of @‘[Sltqte’ establish... informa pauperis cis and indigent 7 “Eltetuto ry ” construction that's applicable +o the [shete” sud:eial eh ous) can Sudiciq] court-members of the site "ettend.” per se [sitorutory. construction —— Without explicit and/or implicit 'E. fetutery Gu thority? [, 70 YR . {a7 i re when pro se indigent inmate obtain q certificate of indigency by order of the court 9nd pre se indigent inmate stotus pie never changed s'eqn Judiceo/ on Court meinbers.celinguish theic stututery conshruction.of dutyis) to.per se. — _ certificate of in di gen “4 when pro se indegeat Inmgte sought sudies¢l court Statutory service of process upen qdverse party (ss — whece prepaid means of sigtutory Construction(s) existed ? 2? At :