Court for initial cirraignment without ilwhen petitioner appearred in Counsel whether the state Court islwas Sequired by the Us. Constitution bth and luth Amendments to advise petitioner of his right to Lounsel to into the ability of petitioner to procure Counsel or inquice if petitioner woul accept a Court appointed attorey as his representative before appointin Counsel to replesent petitioner?

If so 2whether the failure of the State Court to do So Was a violation of petitioner's sixth amendment Secvred autonomy Constituting a Structural erros whicn sequices a new trial?

3.when the state Court appointed an attormey to sepresent petitioner withoud first advising petitioner of his rights to lounselinquiring into petitioners desire for the cid of Counsel inquiring into the ability of petitioner to procure Counsel or inquiring if petitioner accepts the appointment of Lounsel as his Cepresentive: whether the appointment of Said Counsel Violated petitioners Sixth amendment, fight to Counsel andlor the 4th Amendment, due process of law, to the Us. Constitution of:
y
Right to obtain Counsel of own Choosing,and/or
)Right to Self-Representation andlor,
2
I Right to present a defense and/or,
To not have a lawyer thrust upon?

4whether the failure of a state Court to advise petitioner of the 6th Amendment (ight to Counsel presents a Substantial violation ofa Constitutional (ight in respects to 28 U.S.C. Section 2253 (0)(2)

Whether the State Court failed to advise petitioner of his 6th Amendment right to counsel, inquire into petitioner's desire for counsel, and inquire into petitioner's ability to procure counsel before appointing counsel