Should the denial of Mr. Rentas' COA be reversed and reconsidered due to the recent ruling by this Court in Marion Wilson v. Eric Sellers, Warden 584 USS. (2018)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1 SHOULD THE DENIAL OF MR. RENTAS’ COA BE REVERSED AND RECONSIDERED DUE TO THE RECENT RULING BY THIS COURT IN MARION WILSON V. ERIC SELLERS, WARDEN 584 USS. (2018); THE CASE BY WHICH MR. RENTAS’ CLAIM ONE, TWO AND FOUR OF HIS HABEAS PETITION WERE REVIEWED AND DENIED BY THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT AND COA DENIED BY THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS? Ul DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERR WHEN IT CONCLUDED THAT THE DISTRICT COURT’S ASSESSMENT OF GROUND ONE WAS NOT DEBATABLE OR THAT THE STATE COURT’S DECISION WAS NOT CONTRARY TO OR AN UNREASONABLE APPLICATION OF THE CLEARLY ESTABLISHED SUPREME COURT LAW ANNOUNCED IN G/GLIO WHEN RULING ON PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 28 U.S.C. 2253 (c) (2)? WI , DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERR WHEN IT CONCLUDED THAT THE DISTRICT COURT’S ASSESSMENT OF GROUND TWO AND FOUR WERE NOT DEBATABLE OR THAT THE STATE COURT’S DECISION WAS NOT CONTRARY TO OR AN UNREASONABLE APPLICATION OF THE CLEARLY ESTABLISHED SUPREME COURT LAW ANNOUNCED IN STRICKLAND WHEN RULING ON PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 28 U.S.C. 2253 (c) (2) IV DID THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEPART FROM THE ACCEPTED AND USUAL COURSE OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS WHEN IT FAILED TO STATE THE REASONS . WHY A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHOULD NOT ISSUE AS REQUIRED BY FED.R.APP.P. 22 (B) . ii