Did the court reasonably infer petitioner's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1, ‘Did the 4qery reasonably , lagieatty and legally infer From the avid; ance Presented, that petitioner was guilty af viciating the statue beyond a teasonable devbt 2 2, Did petrtioner's qe instructions on the law af principals (elreved the State of its Fourteenth Amendment bucden of praving petibone’s ; Specific, intent to Kut 2 . 3. Was petrtionec afforded effective assistance af caunsel in . avery preceeding of the drial 2 Had Counsel only thirteen (13) days pever . ta trial, . ; 4. Was appellate Caunsel affective foe not faising Ppetthoner’s Faucth Amend ment clam on Aicect appl % ; Did the courts below commit reversible ace denying petitioner's da 54 mation witheut. conducting an avidentary hearing to fegalve the factual disputes 2 , tT Sw ’