No. 18-6498
Gildardo Majalca-Aguilar v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 amendment-782 criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court-discretion drug-conspiracy drug-quantity due-process equal-protection sentence-reduction sentencing-disparity sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in denying the motion for sentence reduction under Amendment 782 §3582(c)(2) despite the minimal quantities of drugs involved in the conspiracy
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The United States District Court of New Mexico denied the motion for reduction the sentence, Amendment 782 §3582(c)(2) spite the quantity of drugs involved in the conspiracy. The disparity of sentences based on different cases of different circuits makes a unfair decision of this: Court. The minimal quantities of drugs involved in this conspiracy dont make the difference to reduce appellant's sentence based on Amendment 782 §3582(c)(2)? C . -i al
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2018-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 29, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent