Does the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals three judge panel have the right to create conflicts amongst the circuits when it unilaterally changed the Supreme Court text and meaning in Fry v. Napoleon Community School?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1.) DOES THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS THREE JUDGE : PANEL HAVE THE RIGHT TO CREATE CONFLICTS AMONGST THE oO CIRCUITS WHEN IT UNILATERALLY CHANGED THE SUPREME COURT TEXT AND MEANING IN FRY V. NAPOLEON COMMUNITY SCHOOL? & 21 2.) DOES CHANGING THE TEXT, VERNACULAR AND MEANING OF A SUPREME COURT OPINION ABRIDGE THE COURTS ORIGINAL _ MEANING TO THE POINT OF CREATING A FIRSTAMENDMENT | VIOLATION? PGS 2, 4 & 28 3.) IS THE 11TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS PANEL PERMITTED TO VIOLATE DUE PROCESS OF LAW PRINCIPLES BY UNILATERALLY CREATING “SEPARATE JUDICIAL SYSTEM RULINGS” FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN LITIGANTS EXCLUDED FROM SCHOOL ENROLLMENT PROCESSES. 2,4 & 24 4.) IS REVIEW WARRANTED BECAUSE 34 C.F.R. 300.154(d)(2)(v) MANDATES THAT PUBLIC AGENCIES LIKE SCHOOL DISTRICTS OBTAIN PARENTAL CONSENT BEFORE ACCESSING FEDERALLY Page 2 of 28 RESOURCES OR PERFORMING THE LE.P. PROCESS AS’ A MATTER OF * LIST.OF PARTIES — 1.) Robert R. Prunty, PETITIONER PRO SE’) ; Poy 2.) The School District of Desoto County Florida and Board of So : pe ; 3.) The Agency for Health Care Administration and Board of Directors4 (Respondents) 4.) The Jack Nicklaus Miami Children’s Hospital and Board of Directors; } . (Respondents) -! #*RULE 29.6