Whether the courts properly addressed the petitioner's claims regarding his constitutional rights and the danger he faced?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED = ot Law Comonstirwirnally 25 ht Kye Apperson life Qe... The Gurte BLISS andl fore Ga Sjhces hoi? # Persen lied) bes Ian Fm renendt Dirge . > He | | and Play Bary 1? far ¥h ay owe heey ee Ooo the lourds Say “He hess ce, Fryuredh 1S 7 Den er Si hreAren ? ° hey he He. Cou. A; po Address Taarrensenr Marrelony ine Darper Gabe (Bool) AB haw Bay [ater (18) Po sonea ge Hee ER allot Pre Must 5, $2 Gal ppegl, o Bel four wv te 5 thwgs L Spots abe we how 04 (but) 2 v Re Fe-asewes and/ Lonel We PRN S bowldln Ye Pmrenent Danger Case Ore ae VOL Bet Sarum heblriseel ? ae Wii Pt on Donut by Po Sone Thad fhy pwr nore, hovsed Plex (It) mendon oe Bl Lope Eras hele) oral hfe on Ap fla? fm Cones jhivh Grn Ant & OG Roe + Thix Grovg,, proof to the is “ORLS Gite Aro Belidre¢, he pata, eR ASCs (GaZ) laurdr wee! S) 9) a 2 PPB Gotten wap Fey s + Benger Gs? Ae Pare hare fhe Coors adehess DE rh say te Ga YM See Go a oh Pred Bh fle B.A F510, STR Ayes Tec. Dap aoe ae feller) Cvof etobreg seg ed ay