Whether the defendant's intent to commit robbery matters

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Does it matter. ; Appeal's Court Judge States " defendant intended to commit robbery : from the moment he first approached or punced Bernal does not matter the crime of robbery reaches all robbers,even opportunistic ones." Petone r Frankie Gc. Lopee presents Anis qurshen | of Lal. — denal Code & AN Versus. Yes | Re Cond ’ b — . 3 noce, (Coober Tans 15 Ack & pecal Co de. S UW HAGE \ 4 | Mere hice & media \ Combet, adfor F any S onttecy, on n . . . oa * feey pp | o: Zi 2 ‘ Lavy v.. Pecker sa) JeS (154 u.td.% Z 3 (807 ) THE stake appellate Court's Dect SO Was One of asestion of taw and/or now evyeneods WW Hat tne strecke teal Suagels Achvons aw A Sk ont erne we “kca Keay AS & Whole had Weevy im perm ssiblf wrong on whe cleat] established Low LISTOF PARTIES . ; [yi All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of , all