No. 18-6546
Alexander Castellano-Benitez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland criminal-procedure due-process eighth-circuit evidence exculpatory-evidence Judicial-Precedent precedent Procedural-Review prosecutorial-misconduct Writ-of-Certiorari
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a writ of certiorari be granted to determine if the Eight Circuit and the lower court erred in failing to follow this court's prior precedent in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Should a writ of certiorari be granted to determine if the Eight Circuit _and the lower court erred in failing to follow this court’s prior precedent in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). , ii : ; .
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 3, 2018)
Attorneys
Alexander Castellano-Benitez
Alexander Castellano-Benitez — Petitioner
Alexander Castellano-Benitez — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent