whether-trial-counsel-and-evidentiary-counsel-were-ineffective

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER THE TRIAL COUNSELOR AND EVIDENTIARY COUNSELOR WERE INEFFECTIVE WHEN BOTH COUNSELORS FAILED TO FILE THE APPEAL OR FAILED TO EVEN NOTIFY THE PETITIONER OF THE DECISION, ESPECIALLY WHEN THR COUNSELORS WERE BOTH FULLY AWARE OF THE "ANTI-SHUTTLING :ITADA VIOLATION AND CORRUPT OFFICIALS THAT WERE INVOLVED IN THE CASE" IN ; LIGHT OF ROE V FLORES-ORTEGA 528 US 470 (2000) AND GARZA,JR V STATE OF IDAHO.(Granted Cert and Set for Oral Argu.) G) . .