Whether the circuit court erroneously violated petitioner's right to due process when it applied an incorrect legal standard to newly discovered evidence

Questions Presented ~ REVIEW IS APPROPRIATE TO REMEDY WIDESPREAD CONEUSION AND CONFLICT AMONG THE LOWER COURTS CONCERNING THE LEGAL STANDARDS FOR ASSESSING NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE CLAIMS: . _ 1. Did the circuit court erroneously violate petitioner's right to due process’ -when it applied an incorrect: legal standard to newly discovered evidence? 2. Do the new evidence that prior to trial, the state’s witness admitted that " "petitioner was not involved in the robbéries and'that they nonetheless intended to frame petitioner for them, insufficient to support a newly discovered evidence claim'on the grounds that it “ merely tends to impeach the credibility of witness” ? . oe 3. Is the new evidence that petitioner as not. involved in the robberies fo cumulative” of evidence that the state witness had motive to falsely ; accuse him? a De oe fs oe oe 4. Are the pretrial admissions by the state’s witness that petitioner was not “ ” involved in the robberies and that they fonetheless intended to frame him : for them “ recantations” requiring corroboration and, if so, are they ' Ue adequately corroborated ? 4 ao 5. Do the newly discovered pretrial admissions by the state’s witness that . : petitioner in fact was not involved in the robberies create a reasonable probability of a different-result?. 0. 2b te es —— : we et .