No. 18-6557
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rule-11 due-process federal-rules-criminal-procedure plea-bargaining plea-colloquy structural-error united-states-v-gonzalez-lopez
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-12-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(b)(1)(N) rule was violated by the inadequacy of the change of plea colloquy?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE THIRD CIRCUIT DECISION BELOW REGARDING WHETHER: THE FED.R.CRIM.P. 11(b)(1)(N) RULE WAS VIOLATED BY THE INADEQUACY OF THE CHANGE OF PLEA COLLOQUY? ‘2. WHETHER THE THIRD CRICUIT DECISION CONFLICTS WITH THE DECISION OF THIS COURT IN UNITED STATES v. GONZALEZ-LOPEZ, 548 U.S. 140 150-52 (2006)? ; oe 3. WHETHER THE THIRD CIRCUIT DECISION CREATED A CIRCUIT SPLIT | WITH THE FIFTH AND SEVENTH CIRCUITS REGARDING WHETHER THE ADEQUACY OF THE PLEA COLLOQUY CONSTITUTED "STRUCTURAL ERROR"? : . . -.
Docket Entries
2018-12-10
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 3, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent