No. 18-6559
Tommy Alexander, Sr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bias civil-procedure constitutional-issue constitutional-rights court-recusal due-process fair-and-impartial-court impartiality judicial-bias recusal tribunal-fairness
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-12-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the District Court displayed bias against the Petitioner, creating a constitutional issue of a fair and impartial court
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The question before this Court is the recusal of the District ; Court in this Cause since the District Court has displayed a _ bias against the Petitioner. Thereby “ creating a 7 ; ; Constitutional issue of a fair and impartial Court. 3 4
Docket Entries
2018-12-10
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-31
Application (18A462) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 10, 2018.
2018-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 3, 2018)
2018-08-27
Application (18A462) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 11, 2018 to November 10, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent