No. 18-6569

Mark Lee Murray v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-924c 18-usc-924c3b categorical-approach circuit-split crime-of-violence criminal-law due-process johnson-retroactivity johnson-v-united-states mandatory-consecutive-sentence residual-clause retroactivity sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess Takings HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-03-01 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), retroactively invalidates the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented For Review 1. Whether Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), retroactively invalidates the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B). 2. Whether general intent “intimidation,” as used in the 1993 carjacking statute, is not a crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) because that version of the statute does not require any intentional use, attempted use, or threat of violent physical force. ii

Docket Entries

2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-11
Reply of petitioner Mark L. Murray filed.
2019-01-28
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-12-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 28, 2019.
2018-12-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 28, 2018 to January 28, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-11-28
Response Requested. (Due December 28, 2018)
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 5, 2018)

Attorneys

Mark L. Murray
Wendi L. OvermyerOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent