No. 18-6576
Susan Kevra-Shiner v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constructive-amendment criminal-procedure due-process fraud fraud-allegations indictment indictment-scope jury-instructions prosecutorial-misconduct verdict-slip
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-12-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a well written verdict slip cure the confusion created when the Government's Closing Argument and the Court's Jury Instructions constructively amend an Indictment to include fraud against both persons and institutions when Defendant was only given notice of having committed a fraud against persons?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Can a well written verdict slip cure the confusion created when the Government’s Closing Argument and the Court’s Jury Instructions constructively amend an Indictment to include fraud against both persons and institutions when Defendant was only given notice of having committed a fraud against persons? (1)
Docket Entries
2018-12-10
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent