Whether the accused's constitutional rights were violated when forced to choose between the Sixth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment in deciding whether to plead guilty where parole consequences were a determinative factor

No question identified. : Ce? . QUESTION (S) PRESENTED : : 1.The constitution requiresspecial considerationin assessing the accuseds conduct in guilty pleas especially when parole consequences is adeterminate factor. Fitts had a choice betweena bump-on-a-log ; and an absent and mute lawyer Does the court violate an accused's rights where he is forced to choose among and between the Sixth Amendment and Fourteen Amendment in deciding whether to plead guiltywhere normative legal issues arean important factor to be considered? 2.When the lawyer was cut out of the pleanegotiations by the prosecutor negotiating directly with the accused’ s family did this produce an unfair or unreliable proceediw? 3.Is Mr. Fitts being held in violation of his Constitutional right to counsel where he entered a plea pro se to murder in spite of the fact that he had a retained lawyerwhere the lawyer was present at the plea but did not functionas counsel and where the lawyer would have been ineffective had the case. | proceeded to trial? . » 1% rf (IST OF PARTIES X] All parties appear in the eaption of the case on the cover page. ! } All parties do not appear in the caption of the cage on the cover page. A list of \ all