Larry Flenoid v. United States
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus Punishment
Whether the supervisory powers of the United States Supreme Court will be asserted to correct the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals summarily affirming the district court's finding petitioner's 'instant' petition solely pointing to a procedural irregularity in the §2255 proceeding was a second or successive attempt at seeking relief
No question identified. : z s QUESTION[S] PRESENTED WHETHER THE SUPERVISORY POWERS OF THE UNITED STATES ; SUPREME ‘COURT WILL BE ASSERTED TO CORRECT THE EIGHTH -. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS SUMMARILY AFFIRMING THE ; DISTRICT COURT'S FINDING ‘PETITIONER'S "INSTANT" PETITION re "SOLELY" POINTING TO A PROCEDURAL IRREGULARITY, IN THE © ; -§2255 PROCEEDING WAS A SECOND OR-SUCCESSIVE ATTEMPT AT °° SEEKING RELIEF’ WHEN THE "INSTANT" PETITION PRESENTED TO oo THE COURT PURSUANT FEDERAL.RULES CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b)(4)=' , AUTHORIZE. AN. ATTACK ON A. DEFECT ‘IN THE. INTEGRITY. OF. THE : PROCEEDINGS WHEN THE DISTRICT. COURT “HAS ACTED IN’ : MANNER INCONSISTENT WITH DUE. PROCESS. UNDER THE FIFTH |: AMENDMENT BY REFUSING TO FILE. AND. CONSIDER’ PETITIONER'S TRAVERSE/REPLY BRIEF FOR BEING OVER-LENGTH BEFORE: PASSING | JUDGMENT THEREBY DEPRIVING PETITIONER OF HIS ‘DUE “PROCESS °~ RIGHT TO NOTICE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD AND TO RECIEVE A "FULL AND FAIR" SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW ON THE ENTIRE RECORD? |