No. 18-6593
Sigifredo Molina-Varela v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-for-severance prejudice prejudicial-error right-to-counsel severance sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-12-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the defense counsel's failure to file a motion for severance create a significant prejudice against the petitioner thereby constituting ineffective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. DID THE DEFENSE COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO FILE A MOTION FOR SEVERANCE CREATE A SIGNIFICANT PREJUDICE AGAINST THE PETITIONER THEREBY CONSTITUTING INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL AS GUARANTEED BY THE SIXTH , AMENDMENT. | : |
Docket Entries
2018-12-10
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent