Willie Safford, Jr. v. Florida
DueProcess
Whether the defendant should be allowed to return to the lower tribunal to challenge the testimony of Rodney Hartmyer, Jerry Gay, and Robert Schran
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Defendant asks this Court to review this matter about letting the Defendant return to the lower tribunal as to the statement that were made by Mr. Rodney Hartmyer, Mr. Jerry Gay and Mr. Robert Schran. And Defendant asks this Court to review that testimony of Mr. Hartmyer, and Mr. Robert Schran, and Mr. Jerry Gay. And Defendant asks this Court to review the testimony of Mr. Hartmyer, and Mr. Robert Schran, and Mr. Jerry Gay evidence in the testimony, as of aggravated battery. If the Court will reconsider, in this matter, a polygraph test will show that Mr. Rodney Hartmyer, Mr. Jerry Gay and Mr. Robert Schran all perjured in the trial. For the Jury to have found Defendant guilty as is of Aggravated Battery. By stating and testifying that, Mr. Hartmyer was punched in the nose by Defendant. Question (5) presented is that is it admissible to take an polygraph test after the fact that Defendant had just found out what had happened in the case, by the State using said statements from the discovery to place an Aggravated Battery, with the original charge of Aggravated Battery with a deadly weapon. Defendant asks this Court as to the Aggravated Battery to please send Defendant by to Court so that Defendant can take a polygraph test because a polygraph test would prove that Mr. Rodney Hartmyer, Mr. Jerry Gay and Mr. Robert Schran statement were false and it could show that perjury was used against : Defendant for the State to have received a guilty verdict as of aggravated Battery...