No. 18-6601
Stefone Dwayne Palomo v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: anders-review appeal appeal-rights appellate-review due-process fifth-circuit-rules frivolous frivolous-issues ineffective-assistance local-rules merits right-to-appeal sua-sponte-dismissal
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2018-12-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Petitioner's right to an appeal require either a decision on the merits or an Anders review with a finding that all issues are frivolous?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Does Petitioner’s right to an appeal require either a decision on the merits or an Anders review with a finding that all issues are frivolous? II. Did the Fifth Circuit comply with its Local Rules and law by sua sponte dismissing a claim without full appellate review? Petition for Writ of Certiorari Page 2 of 24
Docket Entries
2018-12-10
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
2018-11-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2018)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent