No. 18-6610

Mark Johnson v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2018-11-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence actual-perpetrator coerced-confession constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process exclusion-of-evidence fair-trial ineffective-assistance-of-counsel newly-discovered-evidence post-conviction-relief prosecutorial-misconduct selective-prosecution successive-petition
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-01-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner should be allowed to present newly discovered evidence of actual innocence in a successive post-conviction petition, despite the state court's refusal to consider such evidence

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : on St . O° ; QLEstiow (3) PRE SEVTED ()Petthiower Sets Fath a clan of actual MWacence IN & SuacEere ve PO eV Aron Ph hion, The cree, # Court Judge, Corclax L Lusdield Shou lof oF @Rluged Pekehiower, fram Showrsrg Cause aad prejudice, a , oe ae Athan sabe bed yorejizd, co fect Gnd We , actu | woke fost where BES baer succes$ipe Pest carve. | chow petition aLleg ach Phat vewty bbcovereel CViolemee : 3) sapperted a Sree han olpieg clay, of actual enoke rn bE the Pet thi en , was Supper tad bY an WES ave hk £50 He Welinvilial whe efasmed : that he forunitt:d the crime... ¥) BeFore Rtbrouer real Ger ale Sohwron, St a Sttemewt com Fessjont , +o Petits wer Hthervey, aa A Cero lS Sahwesyen, Bok Lhe KEL, ate nid nm Mewk be apr Ae WAS asked of My (er wag fo testy ov ay behave s) The Peasom Gerald glut COSA EY one My Behave to A &ove “Pg | (MME ELEAAEE , 1S because he Was Seared fap ane rtasong he was Weld @& fe two ethene Ys, that Pre 6ecutor's of (oy as Cp ding é) weld wot Believe, vot won (of they exeagf ib aad! he was fatd by the vie til Carl PAS we tee Hs b anal, Deteckive Rabin PaSSwater, Hat ‘fk Ado fh Make ner Mi Ferou ? whak Cerall sariol, .--r 7) Because ; . . ). m, we a Got fis Mucle Lek t The two shatas fresacators broduelad g Aa S Motion i trate to bar Peifhiieer Frown . (YD Combe ssiin Midé by RAL ower Wephew, ) é) te Biitoner (ther wey Kewnre Py Lesh ey, The ctreust court, Tye | Judse Daw tel wr Gon cf re bused to admik the comPessten hecause he Found thé €ovFossson uvre th, ble, at Meat] the detevse called 7 Gera lol a5 4 Wietntess, slop by ude ow wlas he thing happe ¢G vrekiwy weektace, , y oA . 2 QUES: Trew C3 PRESENTE RRS AEE é , of ( Uwkeessive post Se er Ee C are oy, . 4 i. Coary,? £ Dc ‘ 7 ¢ . PY UMEC test py A$ Wor reguccad Ay eet kh 7 an of lou (o “ eofle ¥: Orh'e. R35 rif 1€ BRE tou neers RL GEL BIS Of pol bet eM Twas selectve/, OR ELK ge Cong’)! z ° , * DIO $ , t Due Protess 4 ely ? ecu tod oN the bases , Aad) 70. , et “Zonta v. yvounwe h CASES al LaE OC, avd ([\That den rvad ye an (few the basis oF Stites court errors... SOL US. E C8 Fae Fal, Que /Z 7 oe 7a C0990). the Toral Syd, FOLCES Estelle 4 Me. butcine a by Cre fo adh Corald fol Dawe l um Could encedt | | hate mer apes F fpeval wba . ae LOW FE SSION US & : : a EO ST — /2)) Because ok thats wouter Woe kl, at he therg happon worth Vectra Crag (POSS ‘ Meck tree ace ele the police recovered Gall passoreter , bu ; e fram Fhe an Gerald Soh wser, \deratified as the 13) and the ye ; Leak if i Tria { Judge, Dan fel we Gould, fay we out Aros sg Cail asc fo Jay LT, the fa titrener, could easily AAave geen re water, the victem, wecklace #2 cerald te Sell. v4) WN PL 9~O3 | 7 i the wf wy Thee e four alter She crer2e, Lelivcemev Brite Br LY LL. seat oF he car, hand ca kR beh inact rg back. Police | om er (RE WW Oy (Mouth wese, Blood ome From both, | Is) take me te a Shows Wa, at the kankakee L.fice 8 fateor, Every Hime falicemen Bret, ay out his MoutA Gall pasgusatery a good. Eri'emd, Ag Thraatewed fe ell me, avd ih bw vy Neuth and nose, a5 the Show —up He vishun (dow tiled me, . . | a. QUESTION CG) PRESENTED. 16) ue veetiin Gel fess water, clan bbe! Me ai IEE anol Ame . SO ~ ; OEE the Crime Cee uf, the State's del rhe |} Vee ~Y?, Because Gerald Shwsonw, sdaterent! Combe seb at a Ey E 4 "Ea iy Ey vr twesses to his 11-9 93 case, The state's pres eution wth Ae help of the Tebl Suche, sivew Det Roby he H, oF Vcdhim Catl gas ed Qt Relio passwarer, the Hushavd (m Carl passusater, Rerraiss'on to clo ¢ b Moat after them Criwn ¢ 5 went we ~ Uy the pofivernem, that oil the éear fre -up fr the State's foros eu Fone and $f 5 i P ; ung a @ pass Was ter S47 fo Me, we Lave Mber ber Yor to Stef by, © say do the detects ve, _ Mat wun ber Yuu gat x0 shop f. : L wt to the De theckve. am RA ve fae Det 747 ACoA ber $5, to Step Ay, the Cet fay, the ek oe oy ome ge @ Ham ber he { Zi The Det doing phew C hue ~ 1 Je Mace Show ye j . Munsee 6 awd cde dA dohovtoeg St

Docket Entries

2019-01-07
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
2018-11-27
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2018-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2018)

Attorneys

Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Mark Johnson
Mark Johnson — Petitioner
Mark Johnson — Petitioner