No. 18-6611
Sherif Philips v. North Carolina, et al.
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federal-law fraud fraud-upon-court medical-license medical-statute right-to-honest-services summary-suspension vagueness-doctrine
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether due process of law should be allowed
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : In the Supreme Court of the United States COURT OF APPEAL 16-1119 CIVIL ACTION NO.: 5:15-CV-95F : SHERIF A. PHILIPS, M.D., , Petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE, NORTH CAROLINA COURT SYSTEM, NORTH CAROLINA AGENCY, VIDANT MEDICAL CENER, M.D. PAUL BOLIN, RALPH WHATLEY, DAVID CREECH, JAY SALSMAN, : DEBBIE MEYER, KAREN ZANER, JAMES CROUSE AND NARDINE GUIRGUIS Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States 1
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-01-25
Petitioner complied with order of January 14, 2019.
2019-01-14
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until February 4, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2018-12-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-08-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2018)
Attorneys
Sherif Philips
Sherif Philips — Petitioner